AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Auto keycard2/2/2024 Important Note: This product is Non-Returnable and Non-Refundable. Hyundai Tucson (NOT SE) - 2022, 2023 Hyundai Tucson Hybrid - 2022, 2023 Hyundai Tucson Plug-In Hybrid - 2022, 2023 Manufacturer Part Number(s): L0H81 AB000 To start the vehicle - you must have card on Wireless Charger. One NFC Key Card can be paired per vehicle. The card is perfect for anytime you do not want to carry the paired phone. Allows you to unlock and start your car with a credit card sized NFC key. The NFC Card w orks on vehicles equipped with Digital Key. However, to discuss how the law is going to be (and has been) used, I don't have to believe it's right.The Hyundai NFC Key Card is convenient for anyone who is looking to have quick access in and out of their vehicle. Now- nothing I have said here should be interpreted as an endorsement of the law or definition. "But what about a blank piece of metal?" Sell a card of metal with no markings on it that is the proper thickness WITH the drawing on paper and see what happens.no, seriously, don't. His statements made it perfectly clear that's what the card was for. However, the intention is for this very piece of metal to be used as THE part. Just a piece of paper with the same drawing? Probably OK because it cannot be used as a "part". Notice there is nothing in the actual statute that talks about how easily making the part work for a machine gun must be. Not saying they would not have pursued him anyway, but he talked himself into problems and made proving the "intended soley and exclusively." part easy. "It's just a piece of metal"- sure.so why did Hoover specifically refer to it as having as a "Lightning Link" etched on it? Why did he say: "you have to manufacture it." This is evidence that he knew and expected people to use the card to make a "lightning link" to get to full auto. Is the metal card with the etching on it "designed and intended solely and exclusively.for converting a weapon into a machine gun."? There's enough there to let a jury decide without a special definition from the ATF. The term shall also include the frame or receiver of any such weapon, any part designed and intended solely and exclusively, or combination of parts designed and intended, for use in converting a weapon into a machine gun, and any combination of parts from which a machinegun can be assembled if such parts are in the possession or under the control of a person." The term “machinegun” means any weapon which shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily restored to shoot, automatically more than one shot, without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger. While you watch it, keep this definition in mind- this is the statute, not an ATF definition: If you have not watched the video linked above, 5 minutes of Matt Hoover Saying Incriminating Things- watch it and listen carefully, especially at the beginning. Mainly, this is because of the admissions on the YouTube channel made proving the intent of the card so easy. That is, I don't think they needed an ATF definition to convict on the machinegun counts. The statute has everything that is needed. That happens.doesn't look like that is the case here. In no way did I mean to imply that the ATF used some novel, counterintuitive definition to screw an unwitting citizen. My discussion of Chevron deference started with a discussion of whether a defendant should be allowed to argue that the agency, the ATF here, told him that what he was doing was legal.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |